test Browse by Author Names Browse by Titles of Works Browse by Subjects of Works Browse by Issue Dates of Works
       

Advanced Search
Home   
 
Browse   
Communities
& Collections
  
Issue Date   
Author   
Title   
Subject   
 
Sign on to:   
Receive email
updates
  
My Account
authorized users
  
Edit Profile   
 
Help   
About T-Space   

T-Space at The University of Toronto Libraries >
Faculty of Medicine >
Faculty Publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/16613

Title: Development and preliminary psychometric testing of a new OA pain measure - an OARSI/OMERACT initiative
Authors: Hawker, GA
Davis, AM
French, MR
Cibere, J
Jordan, JM
March, L
Suarez-Almazor, M
Katz, JN
Dieppe, P
Department: Women's College Hospital
Keywords: Osteoarthritis
Hip
Knee
Pain
Outcome measure
Validation
Instrument development
Psychometrics
Psychometric Testing
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2008
Publisher: OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society
Citation: Hawker GA, Davis AM, French MR, Cibere J, Jordan JM, March L, et al. Development and preliminary psychometric testing of a new OA pain measure - an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Apr;16(4):409-14.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measurement properties of a new osteoarthritis (OA) pain measure. METHODS: The new tool, comprised of 12 questions on constant vs intermittent pain was administered by phone to 100 subjects aged 40+ years with hip or knee OA, followed by three global hip/knee questions, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) pain subscale, the symptom subscales of the Hip Disability and OA Outcome Score (HOOS) or Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score (KOOS), and the limitation dimension of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI). Test-retest reliability was assessed by re-administration after 48-96h. Item response distributions, inter-item correlations, item-total correlations and Cronbach's alpha were assessed. Principle component analysis was performed and test-retest reliability was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: There was good distribution of response options across all items. The mean intensity was higher for intermittent vs constant pain, indicating subjects could distinguish the two concepts. Inter-item correlations ranged from 0.37 to 0.76 indicating no item redundancy. One item, predictability of pain, was removed from subsequent analyses as correlations with other items and item-total correlations were low. The 11-item scale had a corrected inter-item correlation range of 0.54-0.81 with Cronbach's alpha of 0.93 for the combined sample. Principle components analysis demonstrated factorial complexity. As such, scoring was based on the summing of individual items. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC 0.85). The measure was significantly correlated with each of the other measures [Spearman correlations -0.60 (KOOS symptoms) to 0.81 (WOMAC pain scale)], except the LLFDI, where correlations were low. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary psychometric testing suggests this OA pain measure is reliable and valid.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/16613
ISSN: 1063-4584
Appears in Collections:Faculty Publications
Hawker, Gillian

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
OA_pain_measure_HAWKER.pdf108.86 kBAdobe PDF
View/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in T-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

uoft