T-Space at The University of Toronto Libraries >
Journal of Medical Internet Research >
Volume 10 (2008) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment|
|Authors: ||Lau, Annie YS|
Coiera, Enrico W
|Keywords: ||Original Paper|
Health care consumer
|Issue Date: ||22-Jan-2008|
|Publisher: ||Gunther Eysenbach; Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, Canada|
|Citation: ||Annie YS Lau, Enrico W Coiera. Impact of Web Searching and Social Feedback on Consumer Decision Making: A Prospective Online Experiment. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(1):e2 <URL: http://www.jmir.org/2008/1/e2/>|
|Abstract: ||[This item is a preserved copy and is not necessarily the most recent version. To view the current item, visit http://www.jmir.org/2008/1/e2/ ]
The World Wide Web has increasingly become an important source of information in health care consumer decision making. However, little is known about whether searching online resources actually improves consumers’ understanding of health issues.
The aim was to study whether searching on the World Wide Web improves consumers’ accuracy in answering health questions and whether consumers’ understanding of health issues is subject to further change under social feedback.
This was a pre/post prospective online study. A convenience sample of 227 undergraduate students was recruited from the population of the University of New South Wales. Subjects used a search engine that retrieved online documents from PubMed, MedlinePlus, and HealthInsite and answered a set of six questions (before and after use of the search engine) designed for health care consumers. They were then presented with feedback consisting of a summary of the post-search answers provided by previous subjects for the same questions and were asked to answer the questions again.
There was an improvement in the percentage of correct answers after searching (pre-search 61.2% vs post-search 82.0%, P <.001) and after feedback with other subjects’ answers (pre-feedback 82.0% vs post-feedback 85.3%, P =.051).The proportion of subjects with highly confident correct answers (ie, confident or very confident) and the proportion with highly confident incorrect answers significantly increased after searching (correct pre-search 61.6% vs correct post-search 95.5%, P <.001; incorrect pre-search 55.3% vs incorrect post-search 82.0%, P <.001). Subjects who were not as confident in their post-search answers were 28.5% more likely than those who were confident or very confident to change their answer after feedback with other subjects’ post-search answers (χ
1= 66.65, P <.001).
Searching across quality health information sources on the Web can improve consumers’ accuracy in answering health questions. However, a consumer’s confidence in an answer is not a good indicator of the answer being correct. Consumers who are not confident in their answers after searching are more likely to be influenced to change their views when provided with feedback from other consumers.|
|Description: ||Reviewer: Hansen, Derek|
|Rights: ||© Annie YS Lau, Enrico W Coiera. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 22.01.2008.
Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.|
|Appears in Collections:||Volume 10 (2008) |
Items in T-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.