T-Space at The University of Toronto Libraries >
School of Graduate Studies - Theses >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Updating Systematic Reviews: The Policies and Practices of Health Care Organizations Involved in Evidence Synthesis|
|Authors: ||Garritty, Chantelle|
|Advisor: ||Skinner, Harvey|
|Department: ||Dalla Lana School of Public Health|
|Keywords: ||systematic review|
|Issue Date: ||19-Jan-2010|
|Abstract: ||Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) should be kept up-to-date to maintain importance in informing health care policy and practice. However, updating policies and practices of health care organizations (HCOs) that fund or conduct SRs are either unclear or non-existent.
Objective: To examine updating policies and practices of relevant HCOs.
Primary Research Design: An exploratory Internet survey of 195 HCOs within the international SR community.
Results: The completed response rate was 58% (n=114) across 26 countries. Although 57% of organizations reported to have a formal updating policy, 59% reported updating practices as irregular. Moreover, 54% estimated more than half of their respective SRs were likely out dated. Resource constraints were a prominent barrier. Most (70%) supported centralizing updating efforts across institutions or agencies.
Significance: This research provides a baseline glimpse of the state of updating among HCOs globally involved in evidence synthesis and therefore adds to a limited body of knowledge.|
|Appears in Collections:||Master|
Dalla Lana School of Public Health - Master theses
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in T-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.