Home

Browse
Communities
& Collections

Issue Date
Author
Title
Subject

Sign on to:

My Account
authorized users

Edit Profile

Help
 Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/24779

 Title: The Development and Usability Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Osteoporosis Disease Management Authors: Kastner, Monika Advisor: Straus, Sharon Department: Health Policy, Management and Evaluation Keywords: Knowledge translationClinical decision support systemsOsteoporosisFamily practice Issue Date: 13-Aug-2010 Abstract: Osteoporosis is a major public health concern, affecting over 200 million people worldwide. There is valid evidence outlining how osteoporosis can be diagnosed and managed, but gaps exist between evidence and practice. Graham’s “Knowledge to Action” (KTA) process for knowledge translation and the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for complex interventions were used to address these gaps. The first 4 KTA steps were collapsed into 3 phases of the PhD research plan. In PhD Phase 1, a systematic review was conducted to identify tools that facilitate decision making in osteoporosis disease management (DM). Results showed that few DM tools exist, but promising strategies were those that incorporated reminders and education and targeted physicians and patients. PhD Phase 2 used the findings from the systematic review and consultation with clinical and human factors engineering experts to develop a conceptual design of the tool. Multiple components targeted to both physicians and patients at the point of care, and which could be used as a standalone system or modifiable for integration with electronic health record systems were outlined. PhD Phases 3a and 3b were devoted to the assessment of the barriers to knowledge. In Phase 3a, a qualitative study of focus groups was conducted with physicians to identify attitudes and perceived barriers to implementing decision support tools in practice, and to identify the features that should be included in the design. Findings from 4 focus groups combined with aging research, and input from design and information experts were used to transform the conceptual design into a functional prototype. In Phase 3b, each component of the prototype was tested in 3 usability evaluation studies using an iterative, participant-centered approach to assess how well the prototype met end users’ needs. Findings from the usability study informed the final prototype, which is ready for implementation as part of the post PhD plan to fulfill the requirements of the remaining steps of the KTA and MRC frameworks. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/24779 Appears in Collections: DoctoralThe Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation - Doctoral theses

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat