test Browse by Author Names Browse by Titles of Works Browse by Subjects of Works Browse by Issue Dates of Works
       

Advanced Search
Home   
 
Browse   
Communities
& Collections
  
Issue Date   
Author   
Title   
Subject   
 
Sign on to:   
Receive email
updates
  
My Account
authorized users
  
Edit Profile   
 
Help   
About T-Space   

T-Space at The University of Toronto Libraries >
OISE >
Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning (CTL) >
Faculty (CTL) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/30027

Title: Skills training versus action research in-service: Impact on student attitudes to self-evaluation
Authors: Ross, John A.
Rolheiser, Carol
Hogaboam-Gray, Anne
Keywords: Professional developement
Professional development methods
Skills training
Student evaluation
Action research
Mentors
Mentorship programs
Cooperative learning
Elementary school
Secondary school
Evaluation methods
Faculty development
In-service teacher education
Self evaluation (individuals)
Skill development
Student attitudes
Issue Date: 1998
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1998). Skills training versus action research in-service: Impact on student attitudes to self-evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(5), 463-477. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00054-1
Abstract: Teachers in 23 classes in one district were randomly assigned to two frequently used professional development methods. In the skills training treatment expert presenters provided strategies for teaching students how to evaluate their work. Teachers received three training workshops, a handbook of resources (containing case studies, strategies, and student self-evaluation instruments), two half-days of in-school release time, and information about the beliefs of their students about self-evaluation. Teachers were expected to implement the strategies presented. In the action research treatment teachers received the same resources but the in-service sessions emphasized the process used by a previous group of (CLEAR) teachers to improve their use of student self-evaluation. The CLEAR teachers delivered most of the in-service and acted as mentors to the teachers in the action research condition. Pre- and post-test student surveys and interviews indicated that the action research condition made a more positive contribution to student attitudes toward self-evaluation than the skills training condition. The advantage of the action research condition was attributed to (1) sharing control in the in-service provided a better model of sharing control in the classroom, and (2) the handbook examples provided to teachers in both conditions were generated in earlier action research projects, making the information more accessible to teachers in the action research condition. The modest student impact of the treatments was attributable to the neglect of student cognitions about self-evaluation in the classroom, the short duration of the project (8 weeks) and the dilution of effects through rotary timetables.
Description: *corresponding author, John A. Ros OISE/UT Trent Valley Centre, Box 719, 150 O’Carroll Ave., Peterborough, Ontario K9J 7A1 CANADA jross@oise.utoronto.ca
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/30027
ISSN: 0742-051X
Appears in Collections:Faculty (CTL)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Ross, Rolheiser, & H-G 1998a.pdf164.26 kBAdobe PDF
View/Open

Items in T-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

uoft