test Browse by Author Names Browse by Titles of Works Browse by Subjects of Works Browse by Issue Dates of Works
       

Advanced Search
Home   
 
Browse   
Communities
& Collections
  
Issue Date   
Author   
Title   
Subject   
 
Sign on to:   
Receive email
updates
  
My Account
authorized users
  
Edit Profile   
 
Help   
About T-Space   

T-Space at The University of Toronto Libraries >
OISE >
Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning (CTL) >
Faculty (CTL) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/32154

Title: ESL/EFL Writing Instructors’ Practices for Assessment: General or Specific Purposes?
Authors: Cumming, Alister
Keywords: ESL/EFL writing assessment
classroom practices
comparative international survey
Issue Date: Apr-2001
Publisher: Sage Publications
Citation: Cumming, A. (2001). ESL/EFL writing instructors’ practices for assessment: General or specific purposes? Language Testing, 18, 2, 207-224. doi:10.1177/026553220101800206
Abstract: A fundamental difference emerged between specific and general purposes for language assessment in the process of my interviewing 48 highly experienced instructors of ESL/EFL composition about their usual practices for writing assessment in courses in universities or immigrant settlement programs. The instructors worked in situations where English is either the majority language (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) or an international language (Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand). Although the instructors tended to conceptualize ESL/EFL writing instruction in common ways overall, I was surprised to find how their conceptualizations of student assessment varied depending on whether the courses they taught were defined in reference to general or specific purposes for learning English. Conceptualizing ESL/EFL writing for specific purposes (e.g., in reference to particular academic disciplines or employment domains) provided clear rationales for selecting tasks for assessment and specifying standards for achievement; but these situations tended to use limited forms of assessment, based on limited criteria for student achievement. Conceptualizing ESL/EFL writing for general purposes, either for academic studies or settlement in an English-dominant country, was associated with varied methods and broad-based criteria for assessing achievement, focused on individual learners’ development, but realized in differing ways by different instructors.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/32154
ISSN: 0265-5322 (Print)
1477-0946 (Online)
http://simplelink.library.utoronto.ca/url.cfm/234691
Appears in Collections:Faculty (CTL)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Cumming 2001 LT postprint 2000.pdf148.64 kBAdobe PDF
View/Open

Items in T-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

uoft