T-Space at The University of Toronto Libraries >
Journal of Medical Internet Research >
Volume 2 (2000) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Anesthesiologists' Responses to an Email Request for Advice from an Unknown Patient|
|Authors: ||Oyston, John|
|Keywords: ||Original Paper|
Referral and Consultation
Medical History Taking
Quality of Health Care
Physician's Practice Patterns
Medical History Taking
|Issue Date: ||18-Sep-2000|
|Publisher: ||Gunther Eysenbach; Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, Canada|
|Citation: ||John Oyston. Anesthesiologists' Responses to an Email Request for Advice from an Unknown Patient. J Med Internet Res 2000;2(3):e16 <URL: http://www.jmir.org/2000/3/e16/>|
|Abstract: ||[This item is a preserved copy and is not necessarily the most recent version. To view the current item, visit http://www.jmir.org/2000/3/e16/ ]
People are using the Internet as a method of getting medical advice. Some Web sites include the email addresses of physicians, and some people are contacting these physicians for advice. As many patients undergo surgery on a "day surgery" basis, they often have no opportunity to ask anesthesiologists for advice before surgery; these patients may be more likely than other groups to use Internet email to ask questions. It seemed that it would be useful to find out what, if any, advice anesthesiologists would give in response to email from an unknown patient.
To determine how anesthesiologists would respond to an email requesting advice about an anesthetic problem from an unknown patient.
In February 1998, an email message was sent from a fictitious patient, using an email address created for this study, to 115 anesthesiologists whose email addresses were found on publicly accessible web sites. The message described the patient's problem with a previously administered anesthetic and requested advice about anesthesia for upcoming surgery. Responses were entered in a database and analyzed to determine the percentage of anesthesiologists who responded, and how helpful, accurate, and complete their advice was.
Fifty-eight responses were obtained from 108 valid email addresses (54% response rate). Of these, 78% were received within 48 hours. Eighty-three percent (83%) of respondents suggested contacting a local physician, 62% mentioned reviewing the old chart, and 41% suggested a specific diagnosis. None of the initial replies contained inaccurate advice, but only five responses were considered to be comprehensive. Ten percent (10%) included a disclaimer with the response. Eighty-three percent (83%) of replies were subjectively assessed as being friendly in tone.
At present, patients who email an unknown anesthesiologist can expect to get a reply from over half. The advice is likely to be prompt, friendly, and to provide accurate and appropriate - but probably incomplete - advice.|
|Description: ||Reviewer: McKenzie, Bruce|
Reviewer: Kuszler, Patricia
Reviewer: Eysenbach, Gunther
|Other Identifiers: ||doi:10.2196/jmir.2.3.e16|
|Rights: ||Copyright (cc) Retained by author(s) under a Creative Commons License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/|
|Appears in Collections:||Volume 2 (2000)|
Items in T-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.