test Browse by Author Names Browse by Titles of Works Browse by Subjects of Works Browse by Issue Dates of Works
       

Advanced Search
Home   
 
Browse   
Communities
& Collections
  
Issue Date   
Author   
Title   
Subject   
 
Sign on to:   
Receive email
updates
  
My Account
authorized users
  
Edit Profile   
 
Help   
About T-Space   

T-Space at The University of Toronto Libraries >
University of Toronto at Scarborough >
Social Sciences >
Social Sciences >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/713

Title: Women, men and dominance in small groups: a social roles assessment.
Authors: Sev'er, Aysan
Keywords: small groups, gender and interaction dominance, social roles
Issue Date: 1991
Publisher: University of Toronto Press
Citation: The Canadian Journal of Sociology 16(3): 265-280
Abstract: There are at least three views about the role of dominance in task groups. According to one view, dominance leads to influence. In contrast, the performance view suggests that task cues will be the basis of influence hierarchies in task groups. The third conceptualization, social roles, considers the link between gender and the evaluation of behavioural styles of the interactants. In the present paper, the latter position is used to argue that dominance by women and men will lead to differential rewards and differential evaluations. To test the argument, an experiment was conducted that held dominance constant, but varied confederates' and subjects' sex. Naive subjects' ratings in same-sex groups were used as controls. As expected, the male confederate received higher rewards, and more positive ratings on affective dimensions. This pattern was not observed in control conditions. The findings suggest that it is not "sex" of the interactants alone, but their sex and dominance that led to the observations. Contrary to expectations, sex of the confederates did not determine the task competence and status attributions to them. Both received very high ratings. Implications of these findings to other decision making situations are discussed. It is concluded that theories about dominance should not overlook the sex of the dominator.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/713
Appears in Collections:Social Sciences

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Women_men_social_roles_assessment.pdf125.45 kBAdobe PDF
View/Open

Items in T-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

uoft