test Browse by Author Names Browse by Titles of Works Browse by Subjects of Works Browse by Issue Dates of Works

Advanced Search
& Collections
Issue Date   
Sign on to:   
Receive email
My Account
authorized users
Edit Profile   
About T-Space   

T-Space at The University of Toronto Libraries >
University of Toronto at Scarborough >
Bioline International Legacy Collection >
Bioline International Legacy Collection >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/9343

Title: Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina
Authors: Yang, Yue-wei
Xia, Gui-rong
Ding, Ping
Chen, Yu-zhao
Keywords: Human disturbance; Dunlin; Foraging behavior; Minimal approach distance
Issue Date: 31-Dec-2005
Publisher: Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Citation: Zoological Research (ISSN: 0254-5853) Vol 26 Num 2
Abstract: Studies on effects of human activity on the foraging behavior of dunlins Calidris alpina were conducted using methods of focal-animal sampling and human-disturbance experiment at the beaches of Yanpen and Yuecheng, Yueqing bay in Zhejiang Province from November 2003 to March 2004. Results of focal-animal sampling showed that 96.6% of dunlins responded to human disturbances at a distance of 35 m or less by either running or flying. Dunlins spent 90% (94% in Yanpen with less people while only 85% in Yuecheng with more people) of the time foraging and 10% avoiding human disturbance generally. Number of persons and type of human activities had significant effects on foraging time, respectively. The distance and frequency of dunlin moved, and the response behaviors of dunlin to human approaching were significantly sensitive to the number of persons, the type of human activities and the distance from humans. The results of human-disturbance experiment indicated that the distances of dunlins responding to human were 3-30 m. The minimal approach distance to dunlins was significantly lager at one disturber than that at two disturbers, but no significant difference between two types of human activities, walking and running. This study tested the hypothesis that the human activities in shorebird foraging areas adversely affect the foraging behavior of dunlins.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/9343
Other Identifiers: http://www.bioline.org.br/abstract?id=zr05039
Rights: Copyright 2005 Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Appears in Collections:Bioline International Legacy Collection

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
zr05039.pdf195.81 kBAdobe PDF

Items in T-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.